We Got Mail

Disagreement With Des Ford

When I was having baptismal studies in 1975, Pastor Chris Jagger from Bankstown SDA Church, Sydney, Australia, said I should ignore Colossians 2:16,17. The Adventist practice used against 2:16, is to isolate 2:16. Line up all the verses that mention Sabbath, from Genesis to Revelation, a straight line can be drawn through them. There are a few verses, like 2:16, that don’t come anywhere near the Sabbath line, and these verses can be discounted. 

Chris trained for the ministry under Desmond Ford who has said, “There is really only one text in the whole Bible capable of being interpreted as a negative reference actually naming the Sabbath, and that is Colossians 2:16. Christians are thus left with the option of judging the approximately 149 references by the one, or judging the one by the 149. And let us remember that Scripture repeatedly admonishes us that ’in the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be established’” [ “Desmond Ford Asks: Is the Seventh-day Sabbath Christian?” Jul/Aug 1996 issue of Adventist Today ]. 

I don’t agree. To Colossians 2:16, I would add Acts 15, and of course the book of Galatians which Paul wrote before Acts 15 took place. Paul said to the Galatians in 4:10,11: “…you are trying to earn favor with God by observing certain days/Sabbaths…I fear for you.” Acts 2:42 states that “all the believers devoted themselves to the APOSTLES’ TEACHING”. Believers soon developed the practice of meeting on Sunday, recalling the day when Jesus was resurrected [ 1 Corinthians16:1-4 TPT, Acts 2:1-4, 20:7, Revelation 1:10, Romans14:5,6 ].

—VIA PROCLAMATIONMAGAZINE.COM, response to “Lesson 13: ’The Tabernacle’

Response: While Des Ford really did understand the problems with the Investigative Judgment and understood that Hebrews 9 disproved that heretical doctrine completely, he did not really understand the biblical covenants. He stayed in that modified “covenant theology” camp that continued to see the law as having a function as a rule of faith and practice for the church. It’s sad to me; he saw so clearly that a plain, contextual reading of Hebrews showed how Jesus fulfilled the shadows of the sanctuary, but he failed to do the same contextual study of the covenants. Galatians, Romans, Colossians, Acts 15, these would have settled the issue. But covenant theory has been the model of reformed Christianity for a few hundred years, and it sees the Old Testament as having a different interpretation in light of the New Testament.

In fact, I do not believe (and I am so NOT alone in this understanding!) that the New Testament changes the meaning of the OT; rather, it adds application that was not yet revealed in the Old. But we can’t change the meaning of the OT text just because we have the NT now.

Contextually, understanding that the Mosaic covenant was temporary and specifically time-limited (see Galatians 3:17–21) confirms that the law had a specific purpose: it shaped the nation which brought the Messiah into the world, and it identified the Messiah when He finally came. Only He could break those ritual laws without sin (as in touching lepers and dead people and breaking the Sabbath). He could break those laws because only He could do so without sin—all while FULFILLING what they foreshadowed: the rest and healing and forgiveness and restoration God promised to send through the Messiah. The Law was like a glove made to fit and thus identity the Messiah. Only Jesus could fulfill it!

Yet covenant theology doesn’t read the covenants that way, and Des kept that covenantal model. He also kept a certain respect for EGW, and I personally believe that those commitments kept him bound to old traditions that in some measure kept him enslaved to them. The Lord used him profoundly—and yet he confused many people, I believe. Understanding that the Law truly had an end point and that the new high priesthood according to the order of Melchizedek necessitated a change of the law would have been incredibly freeing had he been able to read those passages literally, in context, and embrace the rather shocking reality they revealed.


Do you have a podcast where you talk/teach listeners how to pray? 

Are we supposed to pray to Jesus, the Father in the name of Jesus, all Three Persons of The Trinity, and when do you include The Holy Spirit since He dwells in us? Since there is One God in three Persons, I am not sure who to direct my prayers to.

I’ve never been Adventist, and I am not sure how to pray. Did you, Nikki, or other former Adventists have to learn how to pray or did you pray the same way except change your prayers based a new perspective?

Thank you for your ministry.

—VIA EMAIL

Response: I had to ask the Lord to teach me to pray because I just wasn’t sure when I left Adventism. The answer, though, is surprisingly straightforward throughout Scripture: we simply talk to God and let our requests be made know with thanksgiving. Paul addresses prayer often:

And so on.

As for the question about whom to address, the first thing we know is that Father, Son, and Spirit are all equally God. It is not wrong to address any of them. Paul even tells us that the Spirit intercedes for us with groaning too deep for words (Romans 8:26), and Jesus said He prayed for Peter before His death (Luke 22:32). 

However, Jesus has told us that our privilege is to address God as our Father. When we are born again and adopted by the Father, the Holy Spirit teaches us to call Him “Father” (Romans 8:15). Only those who believe/trust in Jesus are adopted and are truly His children. Only believers have the privilege of addressing God as “Father”. That is an intimate address, and we are to see Him and address Him as our true Father who will take care of us, who knows our struggles and needs, and the One to whom we can appeal for HELP and comfort and provision. He has promised to provide all we need, and it is our privilege to address Him as Father. 

Jesus taught His disciples to address “Father…” when they prayed, as the Lord’s Prayer reveals. A believer’s privilege is to know and address God as one’s true Father for whom no detail of our lives is too small. 

A really helpful idea I learned from our women’s ministry leader years ago is this: if you don’t know specifically what to pray for someone, pray God’s word back to Him. We can be sure that praying God’s word is definitely praying within His will! For example, here is a sample list of prayers. There is actually a whole Bible full of prayers that are legitimate for us to pray IN ADDITION to our personal concerns and needs. 

Colleen Tinker
Latest posts by Colleen Tinker (see all)

Leave a Reply