JANUARY / FEBRUARY 2009
VOLUME 10, ISSUE 1
A R T I C L E S
Cults and the Christian
I became a Christian at the age of 17. After reading the book of Mark I discovered a person named Jesus who brought me into a vibrant experience with the one true God. I didn't know much about Christian doctrine. Within two months of my conversion, however, I encountered, for the first time in my life, a number of religious people who seemed interested in me and expressed concern that I was not aware of what they considered to be numerous problems associated with orthodox Christian doctrine.
These people spent two years "helping" me understand doctrines correctly, and in the process, they turned me into a spiritual pretzel. Having grown up with no religious influence and being spiritually naive, I was not alarmed by the five groups that initially made contact with me during those first two months of my life as a Christian. After all, they each had writings that were going to help me understand God correctly. Some of these people even referred to their writings as Scripture and indicated that God still delivers truth through modern prophets.
After two years, I learned the awful truth.
Not one of these groups believed that historical Christianity was correct. They taught me to disbelieve everything I had been taught, even to the point of doubting my very real encounter with Jesus.
When I learned from the Bible that there actually existed "another Jesus, another spirit and another gospel"2 used by Satan as a tool to deceive the very elect, if that were possible, I began a study that has, in different forms, lasted for 35 years. This study has shown me that God's word revealed in the Bible is the only infallible, objective source of truth in this world.
I learned to "check all things, and hold fast to that which is good."3 This checking included reading the "scriptures" of every religious group that crossed my path. In the process I learned that there was one man whose research in this area I could trust—Walter Martin—the cult expert. As I checked out many groups' claims, I discovered that Martin was accurate in his conclusions regarding every group that I encountered. The one thing I forgot in this process, however, was that Martin was a fallible human being, and putting my trust in his research became the source of an almost fatal spiritual flaw.
Martin had been misled by the Seventh-day Adventists. He was told that the doctrines peculiar to the Adventist church were misunderstood.4 The Adventists he interviewed were now using language that had hitherto been mostly absent from Adventism, language that was familiar and comfortable to Martin and other evangelicals. They claimed to hold solely to the Bible as their source of doctrine and over the period of many meetings were able to demonstrate to Martin that they were not the cultic organization that many believed them to be.
Trusting Martin's assessment that the Adventist church was an evangelical Christian organization caused me to disarm myself when I finally encountered Adventism in the early 1980's. I did not put them to the tests Scripture commands us to use.
Adventism provided for me a very secure place with clear distinctions between right and wrong. On top of everything, almost every Adventist I met seemed to adhere strictly to the Bible, and Adventists did not have their own version of Scripture.
The words that were used by Adventists were words that I found in the Bible. Little did I know that my brothers, sisters, and pastors in Adventism used the same words Christians used, but the Adventists had different definitions for those words. At first I thought we had a common language and vocabulary, but we meant two very different things.
Words Are Important
Our Almighty God tells us throughout Scripture that words are important. Jesus is the eternal Word of God (Jn. 1:1). God puts His words in the mouths of the prophets, and they speak whatever He commands them (Deut. 18:18). In the beginning God spoke, and the universe came into existence by His words and through His Word (Gen. 1, Jn. 1:1-3, Col. 1:16-17). In the end, God gives a severe warning to any who would add to or subtract from His revealed word, the Scriptures (Rev. 22:18-19). No Scripture was written by a human who was ingenuous enough to speak for God (2 Pet. 1:20-21).
Not only the ideas in Scripture but the words used to convey those ideas are God's. After I finally understood that Adventists mean different things than most Christians mean while saying many of the same words, I went to an Adventist church website for insight into the Adventist understanding of Biblical inspiration. The Adventist Church does not agree that the exact words of Scripture are important.
How Does the Adventist Biblical Research Institute Explain Inspiration?
After reading through many pages of information on the "high view" that the Adventist church places on the gift of inspiration, the following statements provide great insight:
"Does the divine communication come to the prophet in a specific set of words which he simply repeats? While this may be true at times, the evidence indicates that it is not always true.
"Sometimes the writers are told to describe what they see. Various representations are then caused to pass before their vision with little or no verbal instruction. It would seem reasonable to surmise that the prophet in such cases used his own language patterns. Expressing the divine messages in his own words would allow a writer to change individual terms or to add to a writing if in doing so he could strengthen or clarify the expression of the divine purposes.
"Those who argue for the theory of verbal inspiration for the original autographs are for all practical purposes limited to the thoughts as expressed by the wording of extant manuscripts. But we would believe that the biblical evidence points to a fuller functioning of the human personality. There is a blending of the divine and human agencies."5
Also, in relation to Ellen G. White's pronouncements on inspiration, we find the following:
"Here is her classical statement: 'It is not the words of the Bible that are inspired, but the men that were inspired. Inspiration acts not on the man's words or his expressions but on the man himself, who, under the influence of the Holy Ghost, is imbued with thoughts. But the words receive the impress of the individual mind. The divine mind is diffused. The divine mind and will is combined with the human mind and will; thus the utterances of the man are the word of God.' [Quoting from Selected Manuscripts, Vol. 1, p. 21] (Manuscript 24, 1886; written in Europe in 1886)." 6
The act of "diffusion" results in a lower concentration of the original element as it diffuses into (mixes with) a foreign element. Although true in chemistry, in inspiration it would be strange to say that God's ideas were "diffused" in the mind of the inspired writer. Would God need the assistance of a human writer to "strengthen or clarify" the words that lost potency and effectiveness in the transmission process?
All of this is keeping with the Adventist ways that were handed down by Ellen White. In Selected Messages, Vol. 1, p. 21, she said, "The Bible is written by inspired men, but it is not God's mode of thought and expression. It is that of humanity. God, as a writer, is not represented."7
One can read numerous documents from Ellen White and others within Adventism on the subject of the inspiration of Scripture. Often the words used seem to reflect the same kind of thinking that goes on in most Christian groups and churches. However, one must not become too comfortable with the language used as the definition of the terms that are being used have very different meanings from those commonly accepted by the Christian community around the world. Christians generally regard the Bible as of divine origin. SDAs will agree with that, yet once one presses a specific point of view that is not in harmony with SDA doctrine it is often discounted as not a correct understanding of the intent of the author. As can be seen from the last Ellen White quote above, "God as a writer, is not represented" in the Bible. It is, when all is said and done, a document of human origin in the Adventist mind, even if unconsciously. Since the words were crafted by fallible human authors, others with good intentions should feel free to modify the exact wording to "strengthen or clarify the expression of the divine purposes."
The position of the SDA Church is neither new nor unique among the various American religious cults.
A Brief History of American "Bibles" Among the Four Major Cults8
Joseph Smith, Jr., the founder of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (also known as Mormons) taught that God did not protect His word over the last two-thousand years. Not only did he claim to receive new revelations from God (Doctrine and Covenants), translate newly-found "scriptures" (The Book of Mormon and The Pearl of Great Price), he also claimed direct revelation on how to restore the Bible back to its original wording. This revised Bible is found in The Inspired Version, published by The Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Independence, Missouri (now known as The Community of Christ).
Charles Taze Russell, influenced by Seventh-day Adventists, taught what would eventually be incorporated into the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Jehovah's Witnesses. His time prophecies, which modified the Adventist prophetic understanding of Oct. 22, 1844, culminated in his setting October, 1914, as the date of the second advent of Jesus Christ. Since then, their "Jesus" has been reigning from their world headquarters.
The Watchtower eventually published its own version of the Bible known as the New World Translation. The Jehovah's Witnesses do not believe that Jesus is Jehovah in the flesh. They believe that he is a creature, created by Jehovah God. He is "a god" (Jn. 1:1, NWT) not "God" as any good translation of Scripture will render the first verse of John.
Mary Baker Eddy, the founder of the American cult The First Church of Christ Scientist (Christian Science), chose not to rewrite Scripture. Instead, she provided her followers with a way of interpreting the Bible that was at odds with accepted word-usage. That book, Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures, completely redefines the accepted meanings of words that have been used for thousands of years. In Science and Health she denies the reality of physical matter and provides the following definitions:
JESUS. The highest human corporeal concept of the divine idea, rebuking and destroying error and bringing to light man's immortality.9
CHRIST. The divine manifestation of God, which comes to the flesh to destroy incarnate error.10
Although it took much longer than the three other major cults, by 1994 the Adventist Church had finally published a version of the Bible that contained statements that are to be found nowhere but in their own literature. Although it can only be speculated, this writer is of the opinion that the Adventist church kept Blanco's paraphrase from publication until after the death of Walter Martin in 1989. If this work had been published in his lifetime, Martin would have wasted no time in reapplying the label "cult" to this chameleon.
Are Cultic Writings Available Through Christian Bookstores?
I did an on-line check of internet-based Christian booksellers to determine how well these four groups have made inroads into the world of Christian writings. I searched the top nine Christian booksellers which had internet sites, including the two largest Christian bookstores in the USA. Of these nine sellers, seven of them carried The Clear Word; one, with stores in Southern California, actually had The Clear Word in the physical store on a shelf with other Bible translations.
With only one exception, these same booksellers did not carry any of the other writings developed by the other three major cults. The Seventh-day Adventist organization has been masterful at presenting itself as just another Christian denomination, a technique the Mormon church is now employing.
Letting the "Power of the Ancient Texts Come Through"
"The Clear Word lets the power of ancient texts come through today. As the meaning of Scripture becomes more transparent, you see more of God's grace. His love shines through even in difficult Old Testament passages."11
Although Adventism lagged behind Mormonism, the Watchtower, and Christian Science in the publication of their version of the Bible, they have made up for lost time by outperforming these other organizations with numerous printings and changes. Since its first printing in 1994, The Clear Word Bible has been reworked into no less than seven unique versions of the Scriptures.
The seven versions are: The Clear Word Bible, ©1994,12 The Clear Word, ©1994,13 The Clear Word, ©2003,14 The Clear Word, ©2004 (Pocket edition),15 The Easy English Clear Word, ©2005,16 The Clear Word for Kids, ©2005,17 and Savior (The Clear Word version of the gospels, combined into one narrative), © 2008.18 The Clear Word Bible, original edition, has never been recalled or rejected by the Seventh-day Adventist organization. Although some changes have occurred to the text, the church has not publicly called for the original to be removed from circulation. Because the changes to the text in many cases are not directly doctrinal, recalling the early editions would not change the status of this work.
After receiving criticism for the title, the publisher removed the word "Bible" from the original The Clear Word Bible, and the words "An Expanded Paraphrase" were added to subsequent printings. These subsequent versions are not just reprintings with modifications to the title. They are different versions containing numerous changes to content throughout the books. Most modern publishers will be honest with their readers, indicating changes to content or revision of materials when books are reprinted. The Review and Herald Publishing Association, however, provides no statement to this effect, leaving the reader to believe that he/she has the same document in hand with only modifications to the title. In the publishing world, this lack of disclosure is tantamount to lying.
What is truly shocking, however, are not the changes, but the problematic passages that have remained. Although the back cover of The Clear Word indicates that the author/paraphraser is allowing "the power of the ancient texts [to] come through", he does not indicate that the texts are coming through a very strong Adventist theological lens, replete with quotes and paraphrases from the writings of Ellen G. White. Following we will examine how three Adventist teachings regarding food, Sabbath, and hell have shaped Blanco's thinking resulting in inaccurate wording of the "biblical" text. Then we will look at ten texts dealing with the nature of God.
Adventist Doctrine Incorporated into The Clear Word Bible
The Clear Word Bible has provided us with the ability finally to see the actual definitions of common Scripture passages that are twisted in the Adventist mind. By comparing The Clear Word passages with accepted translations of the Bible there is no doubt that a spirit other than the Holy Spirit is at work in Adventist theology.
Adventism promotes vegetarianism and requires members to follow the Old Testament food laws given through Moses to the Israelites. The Clear Word (TCW) demonstrates that, regardless of what is stated by individual Adventists, the abstinence from certain foods is a major church teaching.
Gen. 9:3, ESV: "Every moving thing that lives shall be food for you. And as I gave you the green plants, I give you everything."
Gen. 9:3, TCW: "Many of these animals will provide food for you, and from now on, you may eat meat as well as vegetables."19
The words "every" and "everything" are replaced with "many," and "meat" and "vegetables."
Of course, the Christian doesn't live by the code of conduct given in the Old Testament. Christians take the words of Jesus and His apostles in the New Testament for final authority on these matters. It is no wonder, then, that Blanco twists the meaning of one of the clearest passages in the NT to promote the SDA understanding:
1 Timothy 4:1-5, ESV: "Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons, through the insincerity of liars whose consciences are seared, who forbid marriage and require abstinence from foods that God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth. For everything created by God is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving, for it is made holy by the word of God and prayer."
1 Timothy 4:3-5, TCW: "Others will say that it's wrong to marry and to eat the good things God created which we should receive with gratitude. God created everything. Nothing should be rejected which He has said we can eat, and we should do so by offering thanksgiving and praise. These foods not only have the approval of the word of God, but will also be blessed by Him through our prayers."
Once one is indoctrinated into the Adventist worldview, the good things God created "which He has said we can eat" is understood to be vegetables and clean meats according to the Mosaic law. In Adventism it is only the clean meat that has the "approval of the word of God." This deviates from the clear counsel of Paul to Timothy that "nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving" and that all food, not only the meat of clean animals, "is made holy by the word of God and prayer."
Mark 7:18-19 record Jesus' words to the Pharisees about what truly defiles a man. All modern translations of Mark include a parenthetical statement at the end of verse 19 which was not included in the King James' version of the Bible. The reason for its inclusion in more recent versions is that older manuscripts than those used for the KJV have been discovered which include this sentence:
Mark 7:19b, ESV: "(Thus he declared all foods clean.)"
The Clear Word in all its versions simply omits this statement. Its omission underscores the Adventist teaching that God requires the observance of the Mosaic food laws.
Saved by the Sabbath
Does the Adventist church really teach that one must keep the seventh-day Sabbath to be saved?
In any accepted translation of the Bible, including the KJV, Colossians 2:16-17 delivers this message:
Col. 2:16-17, ESV: "Therefore let no one pass judgment on you in questions of food and drink, or with regard to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath. These are a shadow of the things to come, but the substance belongs to Christ."
In order to harmonize with Adventist doctrine, The Clear Word has changed that statement:
Col 2:16-17, TCW: "Don't let anyone control your life by giving you a set of ceremonial rules about what to eat, what to drink and which monthly festivals or special Sabbaths to keep. All these rules about ceremonial days were given as a shadow of the reality to come and that reality is Jesus."
A distinction here is implicit between "special" or "ceremonial" Sabbaths and the weekly Sabbath. This distinction is even clearer in the Easy English and Clear Word for Kids where there is no doubt that a weekly Sabbath is necessary for salvation:
Col. 2:16-17, Easy English and Clear Word for Kids: "Don't let anyone tell you that you have to go through certain rituals, eat certain foods, keep certain feasts, or observe extra Sabbaths to be saved. All these things pointed forward to Jesus. So now they're meaningless."
This passage is one of the clearest implicit examples from Blanco's eisegesis indicating that the keeping of the weekly (not an "extra") Sabbath is something observed by those who are being saved. This Sabbath-requirement is the kind of legalism with which Jesus constantly confronted the Pharisees. It is the kind of legalism that Christians are to avoid, particularly given Paul's stern warning to the "bewitched" Galatian gentiles who were being led into Jewish practices like those taught by the Adventist church and emphasized by Blanco.
Hell or Annihilation?
Adventism does not teach eternal punishment for the disobedient. In effect, Adventists interpret the hell promised by Christ as a mercy killing so the lost do not suffer the consequences of their rejection of the eternal sacrifice of Christ on the cross. Only by redefining the meaning of the biblical words can one avoid the terrible consequence of rejecting Christ. At the end of Jesus' discourse in Matthew 25, he tells the consequences for the righteous and wicked:
Matt. 25:46 ESV: "And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life."
The Clear Word removes the reference to "eternal life" and redefines "eternal punishment":
Matt. 25:46, TCW: "I have no choice but to end your lives, because in my kingdom everyone cares about everyone else.'"
In Adventist theology, the unrighteous dead are awaiting God's judgment which will follow their resurrection at the end of time. Once judged, they will be annihilated, never to suffer again. In contrast to this belief, Peter states:
1 Peter 2:9, ESV: "then the Lord knows how to rescue the godly from trials, and to keep the unrighteous under punishment until the day of judgment."
Adventist doctrine cannot have the wicked being punished now, however, because this belief contradicts both their doctrine of soul sleep and the ongoing "investigative judgment". Blanco settles this problem by reworking this verse to read:
1 Peter 2:9, TCW: "From Lot's experience you can see that the Lord knows how to rescue His people but bring the wicked to judgment to face what they have done."
The Amalgamated God
The Adventist understanding of the Godhead has undergone many changes. The organizers and influential individuals within the early Advent movement were primarily Arians and other anti-Trinitarians. Co-founder James White, the husband of their "messenger of God," Ellen G. White, was a minister from the Christian Connexion which denied the deity of Jesus. Upon founding the Seventh-day Adventist church, these anti-Trinitarians were not ready to part with the doctrines they had so fervently defined and defended.
While today's Adventist scholars acknowledge the anti-Trinitarianism of the organization's founders, they assert Adventism now teaches the Trinity. Nevertheless, they have never renounced nor repented of their founding error or corrected its lingering effects.
An important book came off the Adventist presses in 2002, titled The Trinity.
"From about 1846 to 1888 the majority of Adventists rejected the concept of the Trinity—at least as they understood it. All the leading writers were anti-Trinitarian, although we find scattered references to members who held Trinitarian views.... Ambrose C. Spicer ... grew so offended at the anti-Trinitarian atmosphere in Battle Creek that he ceased preaching."20
The Adventist church has never repented of its Arian/anti-Trinitarian position, nor has it dealt with the resulting issues that allow current members to maintain membership while being openly anti-Trinitarian. It is a well-documented fact that anti-Trinitarianism is on the increase within Adventism. George Knight, retired professor of church history at Andrews University, the Adventist seminary, has made this fact very clear in the annotated edition of Questions On Doctrine published in 2003. He states:
"... the denomination in the closing years of the twentieth century and the opening years of the twenty-first has witnessed a resurgence of anti-Trinitarianism and semi-Arianism on the basis that the earliest founders of the denomination held those views."21
The Adventist church is much more articulate about its day of worship than about the nature of the God to be worshiped. They leave little room for error regarding when the seventh-day Sabbath begins and ends and what must be done in preparation for that day. The understanding of the nature of Christ within Adventism, however, is so diverse that one Adventist theologian, Eric Claude Webster, was able to write Crosscurrents in Adventist Christology, showing at least four major streams of thought within Adventism ranging from His being a deified human who showed us how to live, to His being one who was truly God-with-us.22
Jack Blanco incorporates the continuing anti-Trinitarian influence within Adventism into The Clear Word. Below we compare ten passages from TCW with an accepted modern translation and identify the problems in The Clear Word. (TCW refers to the current version of The Clear Word, copyright 2003, that is currently sold in Adventist Book Centers. ESV refers to the English Standard Version used throughout this article. The Clear Word Bible, original edition, is used as necessary.)
Genesis 1:26a, 27
TCW: But this was not the end of His work for that day. Next He said to His Son, "Now let us make beings who look like us and can reflect our thinking and our personality. Let's give them the responsibility of ruling over and caring for the fish, the birds and the animals which we created." So they created two human beings, a male and a female, equal but with different functions, to reflect the unity of the Godhead.
ESV: Then God said, "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.
Problems: The image of God is a physical characteristic in TCW. John 4:24, however, states that "God is spirit", not a physical body. Further, the Godhead in TCW consists of two united beings, not one Being expressed in three Persons as in accepted translations. Since Blanco admits the Son as being present in creation, why does he not also present the Holy Spirit? The oneness of Adam and Eve was never a way to understand the oneness of the Godhead. Paul uses marriage as a symbol of Christ and his church. The Godhead presented in this passage of TCW is a bi-unity, not a tri-unity.
TCW: From the beginning, the Word of God was there. The Word stood by the side of God, and the Word was fully God.
The Clear Word Bible, original edition, reads, "In the beginning, going further back in time than can be imagined, the Word of God was there. The Word stood by the side of God, and the Word was fully God."
ESV: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Problems: "Further back in time than can be imagined" is not equivalent to "In the beginning." Moreover, "From the beginning" is not equivalent to "In the beginning". "From" connotes something continuing since the beginning. "In" connotes a presence not only at the beginning but also before and after. Standing "by the side of" and being "with" carry different theological meanings. One has to do with physical space, the other with identity or "being".
TCW: Jesus answered, "Because I existed before Abraham was born."
ESV: Jesus said to them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am."
Problems: Jesus is quoting the name of God from Exodus 3:14. In the Septuagint, the Greek reads , which literally translates to I AM. Jesus was not claiming to pre-exist Abraham. He was claiming the title of Almighty God.
TCW: You see, my Father and I are so close, we're one.
ESV: I and the Father are one.
Problems: Jesus' statement has nothing to do with closeness, but with exactness. It has to do with identity of being. TCW implies they are separate entities. The biblical text says they are one.
John 14:8, 11a
TCW: Philip spoke up, "Lord, give us just one glimpse of the Father before you go and we'll be satisfied." Believe me when I tell you that the Father would do everything I have done if He were here.
ESV: Philip said to him, "Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us." Believe me that I am in the Father and the Father is in me.
Problems: Jesus is not speaking about what the Father would do if he were there. He is making a statement of fact that the Father is literally in him. The Father is present in Jesus.
TCW: You must believe me when I tell you that I am the Father in action and that the Father is living out His life in me. All the things I've taught you were not just my own, but the Father's. It's the Father living in me who's doing all this.
ESV: Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I say to you I do not speak on my own authority, but the Father who dwells in me does his works.
Problems: For Jesus to state that he is "the Father in action" is (or is bordering on) modalism. The real Jesus does not confuse the persons of the Father and Son. Moreover, Jesus is not confusing the persons of the Father and Son, as "I am the Father in action" would suggest. He literally means He and the Father are separate persons but are in each other.
TCW: Thomas stood there speechless. Then fell to his knees and said, "Lord, you're alive! They were right! I believe! You are my Lord and my God."
Thomas' words in the original The Clear Word Bible read, "Lord, you're alive! They were right! I believe! You are the Son of God."
ESV: Thomas answered him, "My Lord and my God!"
Problems: Scripture does not indicate that Thomas was speechless. His declaration is profound. The phrase "Son of God" as used in The Clear Word Bible is not equivalent to the Christian understanding of Lord and God. There is an old argument used by Jehovah's Witnesses, (not used much anymore) that Thomas was startled and cried out something similar to the modern, "Oh my Lord, oh my God!" In TCW Thomas seems to be startled, expressing emotion rather than making a declaration of truth revealed by God (compare with Matthew 16:16-17.)
TCW, The Clear Word Bible, original edition: With pleasure the Father acknowledged Him as fully God, in spite of His human nature.
More recently, this has been changed to: The Father was pleased to acknowledge the fullness of God in Him.
ESV: For in him all the fullness of God was pleased to dwell.
Problems: This paraphrase is problematic, particularly if His human nature detracted from His deity. The actual Scripture does not allow a question about Jesus' human nature. The Adventist teaching about the "sinful nature" of the human Jesus is a direct result of the teaching of Ellen White. Christ's humanity was absolutely perfect. The Clear Word Bible, original edition, paraphrase, has never been recalled as being incorrect. Many still have and use this version for personal study in the Adventist church. Moreover, TCW suggests that the Father was looking on and acknowledging deity in Jesus. The actual Scripture states that the "fullness of God" was pleased to dwell in Jesus, not merely for "part" of God to acknowledge deity in Jesus. The actual Scripture here is reminiscent of God filling the temple in the Old Testament. Jesus the man was also all that God is.
TCW: In contrast to these ungodly men is the Lord Jesus, also called Michael the Archangel, for He is over the entire angelic host. When He was challenged by Satan about His intentions to resurrect Moses, He didn't come at Satan with a blistering attack, nor did He condemn him with mockery. He simply said, "God rebuke you for claiming Moses' body."
ESV: But when the archangel Michael, contending with the devil, was disputing about the body of Moses, he did not presume to pronounce a blasphemous judgment, but said, "The Lord rebuke you."
Problems: Scripture never refers to Jesus as an archangel. Further, nowhere in Scripture is there a reference to Moses' body being resurrected. This comes directly from the pen of Ellen White. The Jehovah's Witnesses use this same argument to deny the deity of Jesus. If it were Jesus, why did he not rebuke the devil in the same fashion he did when he walked the earth? (See Mt. 17:18; Lk. 4:25, 9:42)
TCW: Each time He spoke, a beam of light like a two-edged sword came out of His mouth.
ESV: ... from his mouth came a sharp two-edged sword ...
Problems: Adding extra "information" can be misleading. Hebrews 4:12 compares the word of God to a two-edged sword that judges people. Isaiah 49:2 describes the mouth of the Messianic servant of the Lord as a sword. Ephesians 6:9 identifies the "sword of the Spirit" as "the word of God". The imagery of Revelation 1:16 connotes judgment, not beams of light.
Mysterious, But Not Difficult
In Adventism, numerous concepts of God are equally acceptable, existing simultaneously as shown in the pages of The Clear Word. One can be an Arian, semi-Arian, modalist, anti-Trinitarian, even a Trinitarian and find support for one's position throughout the writings of Adventism, including TCW. The Adventist God is truly an amalgamation.
What God has revealed about Himself in the Bible is neither tricky nor difficult. By adding words and using human logic we can trick ourselves, but the glimpse of God that the Bible provides can be stated simply.
There is one Creator God. This one God has given us the Bible. In the Bible He reveals Himself to us as Father, Son and Spirit. These are not three beings, but one Being. The Father is God, the Son is God, and the Spirit is God. The three persons, Father, Son and Spirit, are not confused (i.e., the Father is not the Son or Spirit, the Son is not the Father or Spirit and the Spirit is not the Father or Son.)
Analogies are rarely helpful, often generating as many questions as they attempt to answer. The following drawing , however, may help.
"In a very real sense, Adventist emphasis on Scriptures as the sole source of data for executing theology has given theological reflection on God a new and revolutionary start... Adventists were determined to build doctrines on the basis of Scripture alone. The difficulties implicit in this fresh approach may account for the scant number of Adventist statements on the doctrine of God."23
The Adventists' "new and revolutionary start" is neither new, nor revolutionary. Nor are there a "scant number of Adventist statements on the doctrine of God." Adventist literature is full of often widely-divergent statements about the nature and identity of God.
What is scant, perhaps missing entirely, in Adventism, is a willingness to state "we introduced you to a 'Jesus' who was not the eternal, Almighty God. Of this we repent, and we come to the cross to be washed clean by the blood of Jesus Christ."
Having received severe criticism following publication of The Clear Word Bible, the Adventist church has continued to make numerous changes to the text. Christians must continue to hold them accountable for altering the words of the Bible until the organization either gives up its efforts to mold Scripture to its doctrines and repents, or they simply get tired of the ongoing changes and allow the world to see them for who they truly are.
"And Jesus cried out and said, 'Whoever believes in me, believes not in me but in him who sent me. And whoever sees me sees him who sent me. I have come into the world as light so that whoever believes in me may not remain in darkness. If anyone hears my words and does not keep them, I do not judge him; for I did not come to judge the world but to save the world. The one who rejects me and does not receive my words has a judge; the word that I have spoken will judge him on the last day. For I have not spoken on my own authority, but the Father who sent me has himself given me a commandment—what to say and what to speak. And I know that his commandment is eternal life. What I say, therefore, I say as the Father has told me" (John 12:44-50).
Not one iota or dot will pass from Scripture until heaven and earth pass away, and this unaltered word of God will be our judge. We dare not add, subtract, or amend it. Our eternal reward depends upon it! †
Copyright 2009 Life Assurance Ministries, Inc., Glendale, Arizona, USA. All rights reserved. Revised February 21, 2009. Contact email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Steve Pitcher became a Christian at age 17 through the ministry of Young Life and was baptized in a Baptist church. He later converted to Adventism which he left after 18 years. He continues a 34-year study of cults, world religions and the occult from his home in Yucaipa, California, where he lives with his new friend, Lucy, a three-year-old German Shepherd mix.
"Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge? Dress for action like a man; I will question you, and you will make it known to me."
(Job 1:2, 3)1
I learned to "check all things, and hold fast to that which is good." This checking included reading the "scriptures" of every religious group that crossed my path.
From top to bottom:
1. The Clear Word, pocket black bonded leather; Copyright 2004 by Jack J. Blanco
2. Savior, Four Gospels One Story; Copyright 2008 Review and Herald Publishing Association, published by Autumn House Publishing, a division of Review and Herald Publishing Association
3. The Clear Word, black bonded leather; Copyright 1994 by Jack J. Blanco, printed and distributed by Review and Herald Publishing Association.
4. The Easy English Clear Word; Copyright 2005 by Review and Herald Publishing Association.
5. The Clear Word for Kids; Copyright 2005 by Review and Herald Publishing Association.
6. The Clear Word; Copyright 2003 by Review and Herald Publishing Association.
7. The Clear Word Bible; Copyright 1994 by Jack J. Blanco, printed and distributed by Review and Herald Publishing Association.
The Adventist church is much more articulate about its day of worship than about the nature of the God to be worshiped. They leave little room for error regarding when the seventh-day Sabbath begins and ends…
What is scant, perhaps missing entirely, in Adventism, is a willingness to state "we introduced you to a 'Jesus' who was not the eternal, Almighty God.